Showing posts with label Electronic Voting Machines EVMs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Electronic Voting Machines EVMs. Show all posts

Friday, March 22, 2024

242. Today in India BJP and Election Commission are the only protectors of electronic voting machines. They are even afraid to conduct a national referendum to see apart from these two people if it has the support of the people of India!

242

Today in India BJP and Election Commission are the only protectors of electronic voting machines. They are even afraid to conduct a national referendum to see apart from these two people if it has the support of the people of India!

P. S. Remesh Chandran

Editor, Sahyadri Books & Bloom Books, Trivandrum


Article Title Image By Adobe Stock. Graphics: Adobe SP.

Today, the Hindu-activist Bharayiya Janata Party BJP and the Election Commission of India are the only protectors of electronic voting machines in India. It is such a shameless war that these two have been waging against the world to retain it and BJP's rule in India. The nation is waiting to see if the judiciary will also join this run. They are even afraid to conduct a national referendum to see if these machines have the support of the people of India apart from these two! What is their right and ambition over those of the people?

When the world boycotts it and stops using it, they do not let go of it and hug it like a concubine, because turning away from history they have realized how useful it is for the instigation of a corporate rule in India like the erstwhile East India Company which ruled India even ruling over and controlling the British Government which controlled more and far powerful countries than the modern India, and for the formation of a pure Hindu Nation by toppling and overthrowing the secular republican democratic constitution of India. They have proved it before the world and before the people of India. After the electronic voting machines removing ballot papers from India, did anything else come up except the formation of Hindu Rashtra and corporate governance?

With one part of one lakh volume of paper used by BJP for printing its election posters, all the ballot paper for India could be printed. That's why the BJP’s and the Election Commission’s reiteration that they want ballot paper to be removed and electronic voting machines retained to protect the forests which are the source of wood which is the raw material for making the paper to print ballot papers and to avoid paper pollution only denotes the story of the secret marriage between the two. Considering India is the largest democracy in the world and where the greatest number of people votes in an election, when the lifespan of the millions of electronic voting machines that are manufactured every year expires- which is no more than two elections!- is it not a mountain of electronic waste going to reach the whole country? Is it reusable? Is there recycling? Which is more irreversibly polluting- the electronic voting machines or the ballot paper? Which needs the spending of precious foreign money reserves for importing expensive components? The Election Commission is floundering Hindu Rashtra without answer to any of these!

Then there remains only the cost of conducting the election through ballot paper and the time to count it. How many weeks did the Election Commission drag out the election period from 2024 April 19 to June 4 for facilitating the BJP Prime Minister and Reliance Representative Narendra Modi to campaign everywhere in India? Then why speak of the time for counting all these ballot papers? Isn't it the cost that then remains? How many lakh ballot papers can be printed at the cost of a single electronic voting machine? Will someone look at the cost of setting up a government that will have the authority to take lakhs of crores of rupees from the public purse and spend it?

Written on: 19 March 2024 and first published on: 22 March 2024

Original article in Malayalam written on 19 March 2024 and first published on: 21 March 2024

SM1561. ഇന്നു് ഇ൯ഡൃയിലു് ഇലകു്ട്രോണിക്കു് വോട്ടിംഗു് മെഷീനുകളുടെ സംരക്ഷക൪ ബീജേപ്പീയും ഇലക്ഷ൯കമ്മീഷനുംമാത്രമാണു്. ഇവ൪രണു്ടുപേരുടെയുമല്ലാതെ ഇതിനു് ഇ൯ഡൃയിലെജനങ്ങളുടെ പിന്തുണയുണു്ടോയെന്നറിയാ൯ ഒരു നാഷണലു് റഫറണു്ടം നടത്താ൯പോലുമവ൪ ഭയപ്പെടുകയാണു്!
http://sahyadrimalayalam.blogspot.com/2024/03/1561.html






 

 

 

 

240. What difference is there between the head-broken Kerala State Lokayukta and the Central Election Commission? If it was Pinarayi Vijayan who broke the first one, then it was his political partner Narendra Modi who broke the second one!

240

What difference is there between the head-broken Kerala State Lokayukta and the Central Election Commission? If it was Pinarayi Vijayan who broke the first one, then it was his political partner Narendra Modi who broke the second one!

P. S. Remesh Chandran

Editor, Sahyadri Books & Bloom Books, Trivandrum


Article Title Image By Graphics Made. Graphics: Adobe SP.

What difference is there between the head-broken Kerala State Loka Ayukta and the Central Election Commission? Aren't both reflecting the opinions and wishes of those who subjugated them and backing them by ignoring some of the existing laws without fully understanding any laws and only pointing out a few others of the existing laws?

If it was Pinarayi Vijayan who broke the first one in Kerala, was it not his political partner Narendra Modi who broke second one at the Centre? Weren’t both for being in power and not get caught in corruption? Were both works the honest men do? Aren't both of them with the same political moves and life goals? Both with the help of corporates carried out coups in their own parties, got into government, live for corporates, and while in government pour all the public money they control into corporates without any dignity and self-esteem of politicians, and it they call it development!

The party of the one at the centre collects money through bonds from the big money launderers of the country through banks, and the party of the one at the state collects black money through direct corruption and smuggling, and also launders corruption money and bribes through banks.

The President of the country after a heated and heavy political brawl between the State Governor and the Chief Minister of Kerala ratifying and endorsing the amendment of law passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly led as the Assembly Leader by the Chief Minister and pseudo-Marxist leader Pinarayi Vijayan who already faces cases against him in the head-broken Anti-Corruption Judicial Body the Kerala Lok Ayukta to the effect that even if they find him and them guilty of corruption and issues a verdict none of the Chief Minister himself and his Cabinet Ministers need immediately resign as earlier they had to but whether he or they need resign shall be decided on his or their appeal by the State Legislative Assembly majority-orchestrated by him and themselves, was a severe blow and setback to the already picking up anti-corruption movements in the state as well as in the country. The Centre has not come up with the much publicized comprehensive anti-corruption Law the Lok Pal either.

Similarly, after invalidating five or six unimportant actions/decisions/legislations by the central government and deluding people that everything is fair in the running of this country, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court very lightly and unconscientiously upholding the very important and significant new central law amendment that as against the country’s long-standing policy and decision hitherto that the Central Election Commissioners shall be selected and appointed from a panel jointly by the Judiciary’s representative the Chief Justice, the Legislature’s representative the Opposition Leader in the Parliament, and the Executive’s representative the Prime Minister of the country, from hence now forth shall be decided jointly by a committee consisting of the Legislature’s representative the Opposition Leader and two Executive’s representatives the Prime Minister and the Home Minister, with no representative at all from the Judiciary, only taught the people that it was for upholding the latter smoothly and convincingly that the invalidation of the former were undertaken, and that the amendment in the selection process of the Central Election Commissioners was solely for the purpose of easing electoral irregularities and ensuring the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s continuance in rule. Why is the judiciary bending so much, apparently stooping before the Executive, in front of the people? The Supreme Court reasoned (ridiculously and dishonestly) that there was no time to look at the law or current practices as the elections were too near! Who has no time for law- the Judiciary or the Executive? How many times in the past has the Judiciary said law cannot be looked at because there’s no time?


Written on: 19 March 2024 and first published on: 22 March 2024


Original article in Malayalam written on 19 March 2024 and first published on: 21 March 2024

SM1559. മണു്ടയൊടിച്ച കേരളസംസ്ഥാനലോകായുക്തയും കേന്ദ്രയിലക്ഷ൯കമ്മീഷനുംതമ്മിലു് എന്തുവ്യത്യാസമാണുള്ളതു്? ഒന്നി൯റ്റെമണു്ടയൊടിച്ചതു് പിണറായിവിജയനാണെങ്കിലു് മറ്റതി൯റ്റെമണു്ടയൊടിച്ചതു് അയാളുടെരാഷ്ട്രീയപങ്കാളിയായ നരേന്ദ്രമോദിയാണെന്നല്ലേയുള്ളൂ?
https://sahyadrimalayalam.blogspot.com/2024/03/1559.html