243. It’s the ultimate weapon in people’s hands- the right not to vote! Only they have it, only in their hands!!

243

It’s the ultimate weapon in people’s hands- the right not to vote! Only they have it, only in their hands!!

P. S. Remesh Chandran

Editor, Sahyadri Books & Bloom Books, Trivandrum

Article Title Image By MasterTux. Graphics: Adobe SP.

After examining all aspects, the Constitution Drafting Committee of India conferred a special status to the state of Kashmir. Seventy years later, when a person named Narendra Modi came to power as the Prime Minister of the Hindu activist Bharatiya Janata Party, BJP, he took away that special status through an amendment of the Constitution and opened the state as a real estate market for the big corporations, made it possible for anyone to go and purchase land there, and took broker fees from the beneficiaries for the BJP. The Election Commission of India reiterates people should go to polling booths and vote periodically for some people to be empowered to carry out such amputations and modifications in the Constitution. Does the Election Commission guarantee that such coups will not take place on the Constitution? They who are not capable of doing that, why say people should go and vote for delegating their powers to someone to carry out those coups in the constitution?

If they win without people's vote, through some pre-programmed and remotely controlled manipulations of the electronic voting machines of theirs and subvert the constitution, let them do it! Or else, the people themselves will decide not to vote. That is what is going on in the country and people are reaching this conclusion. If so, who else except they themselves who are the sovereigns of the country has the right to question them about it? Even in the latest verdict on 2024 March 22 also, the Madras High Court observed that people cannot be coerced to go for voting and that no law exists to make them do it.

Even the President of the country does not have any independent powers but only those powers delegated to the MPs by the people through their votes which in turn were delegated to the President by the MPs. Even the judiciary appointed by the President has even less powers than that. Do you think the legislature and the executive, which are not even as powerful as the other two entities and are in fact submissive to people’s powers, will enact laws to hang people who do not vote, and the people will finally come to the conclusion that if they do not vote they will be hanged and finally go and vote? The Brahma Astra- the Fire Dart- the Ultimate Weapon- is placed in the hands of the people- the right not to vote! It’s only in their hands!!
 

When confronted with questions by media in Madurai, the then Chief Election Commissioner Naveen B. Chawla asked in return if the two hundred million people of India decided not to vote, could separate cases be taken against them all in the country’s courts! A question no one asked but still remains. The world is not yet free from the fear of Corona and it doesn't look it will be in the near future, because the serious, dangerous, long-lasting, and fatal side effects of the drugs claimed to have been discovered to cure it are only just beginning to come out. It was as part of control measures that there was a restriction on one person touching a part or place which another person’s finger touched before sanitizing and washing it. It has been implemented in from seats in buses, trains and airplanes to even keypads in ATM counters. What about electronic voting machines?
 

In any case, the credibility of the Chief Election Commissioner, the Election Commission and the electronic voting machines has plummeted as far as the people are concerned. Surveys indicate that it has dropped from seventy percent in 2019 to less than forty percent in 2024. For who else but the BJP and its Hindu Rashtra that the Chief Election Commission holds on to these machines which the people do not want?

Written on 21 May 2019 and first published on 23 March 2024 

Original article in Malayalam written on: 21 May 2019 and first published on: 05 March 2024

SM1550. ബ്രഹ്മാസ്സു്ത്രമാണുജനങ്ങളുടെ കൈയ്യിലു്വെച്ചിരിക്കുന്നതു്- വോട്ടുചെയ്യാതിരിക്കാനുള്ളയധികാരം! അവരുടെകൈയ്യിലേയതുള്ളൂ. ജനങ്ങളുടെകൈയ്യിലുള്ള ആത്യന്തിക ആയുധമാണു് വോട്ടുചെയ്യാതിരിക്കാനുള്ളയധികാരം!
http://sahyadrimalayalam.blogspot.com/2024/03/1550.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

242. Today in India BJP and Election Commission are the only protectors of electronic voting machines. They are even afraid to conduct a national referendum to see apart from these two people if it has the support of the people of India!

242

Today in India BJP and Election Commission are the only protectors of electronic voting machines. They are even afraid to conduct a national referendum to see apart from these two people if it has the support of the people of India!

P. S. Remesh Chandran

Editor, Sahyadri Books & Bloom Books, Trivandrum

Article Title Image By Adobe Stock. Graphics: Adobe SP.

Today, the Hindu-activist Bharayiya Janata Party BJP and the Election Commission of India are the only protectors of electronic voting machines in India. It is such a shameless war that these two have been waging against the world to retain it and BJP's rule in India. The nation is waiting to see if the judiciary will also join this run. They are even afraid to conduct a national referendum to see if these machines have the support of the people of India apart from these two! What is their right and ambition over those of the people?

When the world boycotts it and stops using it, they do not let go of it and hug it like a concubine, because turning away from history they have realized how useful it is for the instigation of a corporate rule in India like the erstwhile East India Company which ruled India even ruling over and controlling the British Government which controlled more and far powerful countries than the modern India, and for the formation of a pure Hindu Nation by toppling and overthrowing the secular republican democratic constitution of India. They have proved it before the world and before the people of India. After the electronic voting machines removing ballot papers from India, did anything else come up except the formation of Hindu Rashtra and corporate governance?

With one part of one lakh volume of paper used by BJP for printing its election posters, all the ballot paper for India could be printed. That's why the BJP’s and the Election Commission’s reiteration that they want ballot paper to be removed and electronic voting machines retained to protect the forests which are the source of wood which is the raw material for making the paper to print ballot papers and to avoid paper pollution only denotes the story of the secret marriage between the two. Considering India is the largest democracy in the world and where the greatest number of people votes in an election, when the lifespan of the millions of electronic voting machines that are manufactured every year expires- which is no more than two elections!- is it not a mountain of electronic waste going to reach the whole country? Is it reusable? Is there recycling? Which is more irreversibly polluting- the electronic voting machines or the ballot paper? Which needs the spending of precious foreign money reserves for importing expensive components? The Election Commission is floundering Hindu Rashtra without answer to any of these!

Then there remains only the cost of conducting the election through ballot paper and the time to count it. How many weeks did the Election Commission drag out the election period from 2024 April 19 to June 4 for facilitating the BJP Prime Minister and Reliance Representative Narendra Modi to campaign everywhere in India? Then why speak of the time for counting all these ballot papers? Isn't it the cost that then remains? How many lakh ballot papers can be printed at the cost of a single electronic voting machine? Will someone look at the cost of setting up a government that will have the authority to take lakhs of crores of rupees from the public purse and spend it?

Written on: 19 March 2024 and first published on: 22 March 2024

Original article in Malayalam written on 19 March 2024 and first published on: 21 March 2024

SM1561. ഇന്നു് ഇ൯ഡൃയിലു് ഇലകു്ട്രോണിക്കു് വോട്ടിംഗു് മെഷീനുകളുടെ സംരക്ഷക൪ ബീജേപ്പീയും ഇലക്ഷ൯കമ്മീഷനുംമാത്രമാണു്. ഇവ൪രണു്ടുപേരുടെയുമല്ലാതെ ഇതിനു് ഇ൯ഡൃയിലെജനങ്ങളുടെ പിന്തുണയുണു്ടോയെന്നറിയാ൯ ഒരു നാഷണലു് റഫറണു്ടം നടത്താ൯പോലുമവ൪ ഭയപ്പെടുകയാണു്!
http://sahyadrimalayalam.blogspot.com/2024/03/1561.html

 

 

 

 

241. India does not have a tradition of expelling asylum seekers, only BJP does! India's citizenship is not based on religion, it belongs to Hindu Rashtra BJP only!!

241

India does not have a tradition of expelling asylum seekers, only BJP does! India's citizenship is not based on religion, it belongs to Hindu Rashtra BJP only!!

P. S. Remesh Chandran

Editor, Sahyadri Books & Bloom Books, Trivandrum

Article Title Image By Adobe Stock. Graphics: Adobe SP.

India does not have a tradition of expelling those who seek asylum in India- only the ruling Hindu party BJP does! India's citizenship is not based on religion- that conviction belongs to the Hindu Rashtra BJP. The Indian National Congress’ several leaders, who are running to and joining the BJP even while knowing this, are highly reprehensible. They are those who do not see the Future India as a reunified nation, those who ignore that possibility, and those who fixate on the comfort of today. Not only the Congress leaders but also the leaders of the pseudo leftist parties in India like the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPIM) who run to the BJP even while knowing this, are reprehensible and despicable in politics as well as in the name of statesmanship.

Plato from Greece in the 6th century BC and Jesus Christ from Palestine in the years of Christ were the most noted earlier refugees who sought salvation from the persecution in their native lands and seeing the light of knowledge and protection came to India! Although they did not stay longer enough to get citizenship, they were given asylum, trained as fighters, and were sent back by India to their native lands to continue their fight. The world witnessed the thrilling events that followed. How many of these refugees who are coming to India today will be like these, in the future world?

A twenty-first article was written and added to India's constitution to allow those arriving as refugees from abroad to live and work in India with dignity and to gradually receive Indian citizenship. The level of political ideas, thoughts, perceptions and principles in India were such great and high then. Citizenship for refugees without looking at any religion, caste or color criteria was taken for granted by the sons of India then and envisaged and assured in that way then in the Constitution of India. The Indian National Congress, the liberators of India from the British yoke, which had written and added it in the constitution and maintained it so far under their rule, demanding before the present BJP administration which has come together to change it that it remain so, is fairness, dignity and total pride for the people of India.

Introducing and passing the Citizenship Amendment Act was a pre-emptive legislative measure in advance, knowing that though justifying it by saying that it is for preventing the population from not going too high that this glorious right of citizenship to refugees was limited to those who have settled long ago will save a little time for their lie to last, in the course of time, India will become a more secular and united nation than it is today, and it will mark the end of the religious and political oppressors’ regime that is the BJP’s that is on the rise today through exploiting the extreme religious sentiments of the undereducated and uneducated Hindus. A pre-emptive legislative measure is in fact introduced and passed today in the name of Citizenship Amendment Act. How could permanent residents come as refugees?

They boast their law-making is final because it was passed by the Indian Parliament. Today everyone knows that if a popular agitation of sufficient strength arises, that law and any law they pass will backfire on them like many others have, because the people are above the lawmakers, not below, though these legislators assembled by the BJP don’t seem to think so. It was not one but three Agricultural Amendment Acts declared by them final and irreversible which were unconditionally canceled and withdrawn by summoning the Parliament and the Cabinet for a second time after a legendary farmers' strike.

There is an abundance of anti-nationals in India who see what India is as an ugly thing. Today their names are Bharatiya Janata Party, Rashtriya Swayamsevaka Sangh, Adani, Reliance, Patanjali, etc. When we hearken the name of India, the sound of India, we vibrate with pride, but they wilt, go flaccid, and urinate because of humiliation. So they were eager to change her name to something else unknown to the present day world!

In their convoluted, degenerated and rotten minds, the concept of citizenship is Hindus, Christians, Buddhists and Jains from abroad, but no Muslims, ever, especially from immediately neighboring countries. If they give citizenship to people from Pakistan and Bangladesh who were once Indians, who are exactly Indians without any difference in their faces, clothes and lifestyles, who still speak Hindi and are yearning to join the civic life of India and embrace the heart of India, they fear their sixteen thousand gods and goddesses they carry in their termite-frayed minds and believe somewhere exists will become angry!

These entities and enterprises Bharatiya Janata Party, Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh, Adani, Reliance, Patanjali, etc., among those who today say theirs is pure Indian blood, no sweat and blood were mixed during invasions, occupations, conquering and subjugations by foreigners in wars and army moves for thousands of years, and no child was born from mutual mating, how much pure Hindu blood is there, and which of them has it? Other than the notions of birth and paternity mouthed by fathers and mothers, what base is there for their claims? Is there a written genealogy of the Hindu rulers and prominent Hindu families who existed before the rise of Christianity and Islam and who were born in India and not come from abroad kept, as those preserved in the church archives and royal palaces of England and in churches like Canterbury and universities like Cambridge and Oxford? How many years does their family history and bloodline go back? All these are just convictions, not facts, only whispers from mothers and fathers dear blue-bloods…! If they were not, would the RSS and these others have gone into hiding without participating in India's freedom struggle against their proclaimed Christian enemy the British- the real fight which only the Indian National Congress and the Indian Muslim League undertook?

Coming to the core of things, the people of these countries and the Indian National Congress hope that India, Pakistan and Bangladesh will unite again and become one, just like the two Germanys and a few other countries divided after World War II were united. That is what they are waiting for, and it is policies to bring about this that they are following. But if that happens, the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Rashtriya Swayam Sevaka Sangh, and the shadow rulers like Adani, Reliance and Patanjali will vanish and all of them, based only on extreme Hinduism, will lose their relevance. When the world's time is right for that, they are raising an emotional barrier against this unification of three countries and three peoples and preparing themselves for a final acrimonious battle, through their passing of the Citizenship Amendment Act which is a joint hybrid offspring of theirs, and the censure and denunciation of the immediately neighboring countries.

It is the Bharatiya Janata Party that is afraid to accept to India and accord citizenship to refugees from the four immediately surrounding countries like Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Burma because they will have to share government with so many Muslims from presently what are foreign countries, even while changing the name of India to Bhaaratham, dreaming of reclaiming and resurrecting the Emperor Bharata’s empire Bhaaratham which in that ancient past had consisted of so many lands including Sri Lanka (Rathna Dweepam then), Sindhu (India), Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nepal (Neppaalam), Afghanistan (Apa Ghana Sdhanam), Burma (Brahma Desam), and as far distant countries as Thailand (Amma Desam), Viet Nam, Siam (Syaama Raajyam) and a few smaller others! That is why the people have come to the conclusion that there is no politics in BJP's rule, that it is only a temporary opportunistic arrangement for some Hindu corporate rich men to exploit at will existing people’s markets and newly force-opened ones like Kashmir for a short period of time while in power, and to eat, grow fat and expand before the world in a way that has never been seen before.

…..

…..

…..

Written on: 19 March 2024 and first published on: 22 March 2024

Original article in Malayalam written on 19 March 2024 and first published on: 21 March 2024

SM1560. ഇ൯ഡൃയിലു് അഭയംചോദിച്ചുവരുന്നവരെ പുറന്തള്ളുന്നപാരമ്പര്യം ഇ൯ഡ്യാരാജ്യത്തിനില്ല, ബീജേപ്പീയു്ക്കേയുള്ളൂ! മതമനുസരിച്ചല്ല ഇ൯ഡൃയുടെപൗരത്വം, അതുഹിന്ദുരാഷ്ട്രബീജേപ്പീയുടേതാണു്!!
https://sahyadrimalayalam.blogspot.com/2024/03/1560.html





 

 

 

 

240. What difference is there between the head-broken Kerala State Lokayukta and the Central Election Commission? If it was Pinarayi Vijayan who broke the first one, then it was his political partner Narendra Modi who broke the second one!

240

What difference is there between the head-broken Kerala State Lokayukta and the Central Election Commission? If it was Pinarayi Vijayan who broke the first one, then it was his political partner Narendra Modi who broke the second one!

P. S. Remesh Chandran

Editor, Sahyadri Books & Bloom Books, Trivandrum

Article Title Image By Graphics Made. Graphics: Adobe SP.

What difference is there between the head-broken Kerala State Loka Ayukta and the Central Election Commission? Aren't both reflecting the opinions and wishes of those who subjugated them and backing them by ignoring some of the existing laws without fully understanding any laws and only pointing out a few others of the existing laws?

If it was Pinarayi Vijayan who broke the first one in Kerala, was it not his political partner Narendra Modi who broke second one at the Centre? Weren’t both for being in power and not get caught in corruption? Were both works the honest men do? Aren't both of them with the same political moves and life goals? Both with the help of corporates carried out coups in their own parties, got into government, live for corporates, and while in government pour all the public money they control into corporates without any dignity and self-esteem of politicians, and it they call it development!

The party of the one at the centre collects money through bonds from the big money launderers of the country through banks, and the party of the one at the state collects black money through direct corruption and smuggling, and also launders corruption money and bribes through banks.

The President of the country after a heated and heavy political brawl between the State Governor and the Chief Minister of Kerala ratifying and endorsing the amendment of law passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly led as the Assembly Leader by the Chief Minister and pseudo-Marxist leader Pinarayi Vijayan who already faces cases against him in the head-broken Anti-Corruption Judicial Body the Kerala Lok Ayukta to the effect that even if they find him and them guilty of corruption and issues a verdict none of the Chief Minister himself and his Cabinet Ministers need immediately resign as earlier they had to but whether he or they need resign shall be decided on his or their appeal by the State Legislative Assembly majority-orchestrated by him and themselves, was a severe blow and setback to the already picking up anti-corruption movements in the state as well as in the country. The Centre has not come up with the much publicized comprehensive anti-corruption Law the Lok Pal either.

Similarly, after invalidating five or six unimportant actions/decisions/legislations by the central government and deluding people that everything is fair in the running of this country, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court very lightly and unconscientiously upholding the very important and significant new central law amendment that as against the country’s long-standing policy and decision hitherto that the Central Election Commissioners shall be selected and appointed from a panel jointly by the Judiciary’s representative the Chief Justice, the Legislature’s representative the Opposition Leader in the Parliament, and the Executive’s representative the Prime Minister of the country, from hence now forth shall be decided jointly by a committee consisting of the Legislature’s representative the Opposition Leader and two Executive’s representatives the Prime Minister and the Home Minister, with no representative at all from the Judiciary, only taught the people that it was for upholding the latter smoothly and convincingly that the invalidation of the former were undertaken, and that the amendment in the selection process of the Central Election Commissioners was solely for the purpose of easing electoral irregularities and ensuring the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s continuance in rule. Why is the judiciary bending so much, apparently stooping before the Executive, in front of the people? The Supreme Court reasoned (ridiculously and dishonestly) that there was no time to look at the law or current practices as the elections were too near! Who has no time for law- the Judiciary or the Executive? How many times in the past has the Judiciary said law cannot be looked at because there’s no time?

Written on: 19 March 2024 and first published on: 22 March 2024

Original article in Malayalam written on 19 March 2024 and first published on: 21 March 2024

SM1559. മണു്ടയൊടിച്ച കേരളസംസ്ഥാനലോകായുക്തയും കേന്ദ്രയിലക്ഷ൯കമ്മീഷനുംതമ്മിലു് എന്തുവ്യത്യാസമാണുള്ളതു്? ഒന്നി൯റ്റെമണു്ടയൊടിച്ചതു് പിണറായിവിജയനാണെങ്കിലു് മറ്റതി൯റ്റെമണു്ടയൊടിച്ചതു് അയാളുടെരാഷ്ട്രീയപങ്കാളിയായ നരേന്ദ്രമോദിയാണെന്നല്ലേയുള്ളൂ?
https://sahyadrimalayalam.blogspot.com/2024/03/1559.html