164. What right has Mr. Imran Khan and Mr. Narendra Modi to tell people that they changed, so people too should change like chameleons? P S Remesh Chandran

164

What right has Mr. Imran Khan and Mr. Narendra Modi to tell people that they changed, so people too should change like chameleons?

P. S. Remesh Chandran

Editor, Sahyadri Books & Bloom Books, Trivandrum
  Article Title Image 1 By Gerhard Gellinger. Graphics: Adobe SP.
 

In Al Jazeera’s interview of Mr. Imran Khan on 14 September 2019 he said his country may have to resort to N-War against India if it comes to it. Sure, he can point out what he thinks is a possibility in future. But isn’t India’s ruling party BJP also exploiting the sentiments of a few Indians against the people of its sister nation like he does with Pakistanis’? Didn’t Mr. Narendra Modi receive his Pakistani counterpart several times in India and abroad warmly? Didn’t he publicly state that both countries were going to expand trade links and cultural cooperation? Could he tell the world that people should never believe his words and take them for granted? Didn’t both leaders embrace each other to show to their people that they are brothers? Do we embrace our enemies everyday? If they were performing as hypocrites for diplomacy’s sake, let them know that their people are not. Didn’t trains run between Delhi and Islamabad daily, without interruption, with both countries’ protection? Didn’t Pakistani theatres show Indian films and Indians listened to Pakistani ghazals regularly?

What message were these two prime ministers giving to the people in both countries till now through these acts of theirs- that they should go to war or that they should live in peace and cooperation? People have a sincerity, truthfulness, loyalty, friendship and history unlike bad politicians. What right has Mr. Imran Khan and Mr. Narendra Modi to tell people that they have changed attitudes and outlooks, so people too should change attitudes and outlooks all of a sudden like chameleons? When both these politicians used the N-War term, both were giving very wrong messages to the people in both countries. How will they create contained n-plosions without affecting Bangladesh, Burma, Bhutan, Nepal, Tibet and Sri Lanka? There are international forums to solve disputes, especially in the wake and threat of n-detonations. Pakistan is ruled by a fundamentalist Muslim party. India is ruled by an equally fundamentalist Hindu party. What difference is there except that theirs are two different religions?

Article Title Image 2 By Nandhu Kumar. Graphics: Adobe SP.

Written and first Published on: 17 September 2019


More English articles by the author at:
http://sahyadribooks-remesh.blogspot.com/
 
Malayalam articles by the author at:
http://sahyadrimalayalam.blogspot.in/
 
More political article by the author here:
http://sahyadribooks-remesh.blogspot.com/p/list-of-political-articles.html
 
About the Author P. S. Remesh Chandran:

Editor of Sahyadri Books & Bloom Books, Trivandrum. Author of several books in English and in Malayalam. And also author of Swan: The Intelligent Picture Book. Born and brought up in the beautiful village of Nanniyode in the Sahya Mountain Valley in Trivandrum, in Kerala. Father British Council trained English teacher and Mother University educated. Matriculation with distinction and Pre Degree Studies in Science with National Merit Scholarship. Discontinued Diploma studies in Electronics and entered politics. Unmarried and single.

Face Book: https://www.facebook.com/psremeshchandra.trivandrum
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PSRemeshChandra
You Tube: http://www.youtube.com/user/bloombooks/videos
Blog: http://sahyadribooks-remesh.blogspot.com/
Site: https://sites.google.com/site/timeuponmywindowsill/
E-Mail: bloombookstvm@gmail.com

Post: P. S. Remesh Chandran, Editor, Sahyadri Books, Trivandrum, Padmalayam, Nanniyode, Pacha Post, Trivandrum- 695562, Kerala State, South India.

Tags:

Imran Khan, Nuclear War, India Pakistan, Delhi Islamabad, Fundamentalism, Explosions, Detonations, Hindu Party, Ghazals, Indian Politics, India News, English Essays, Political Essays, Current Affairs, // N War, Muslim Party, Indian Films,

 

161. Will Kashmir Move help India secure UN Security Council membership, or close that half-open door for ever? P S Remesh Chandran

161

Will Kashmir Move help India secure UN Security Council membership, or close that half-open door for ever?

P. S. Remesh Chandran

Editor, Sahyadri Books & Bloom Books, Trivandrum

Article Title Image 1 By Mostafa Meraji. Graphics: Adobe SP.

India has long been vying for a permanent membership in the UN Security Council to sit with America, Britain, France, China and Russia. India’s decades-long struggle for securing this coveted position very nearly came to fruition recently but for not getting enough votes. There was then an atmosphere of India winning this position in her next try.

This was before the Kashmir issue became bold headlines in the world’s media again and became a hot topic for discussion in world capitals and international forums in August 2019. It was reported that the India government under the Hindu regime of Bharatiya Janata Party or BJP met in parliament for a very brief session and using the majority of seats in parliament which is already under fire for the first time in India for massive election rigging and voting machine manipulation, passed a bill taking away the special status given to Jammu & Kashmir in 1947 at the time when India gained independence from the British, thus unilaterally resolving within a few minutes without discussion the most controversial issue between India and Pakistan which the world has been discussing for decades.

Article Title Image 2 By Mostafa Meraji. Graphics: Adobe SP.

Not only was the twin state of Jammu & Kashmir split into two separate states making the former secular twin state into a Hindu-dominating Jammu and a Muslim-dominating Kashmir- a move no democratic and secular Indian leader till now did not dare take- but the people of Kashmir including their former Chief Ministers and leaders were also put in prisons and a curfew and news and communication blackout declared. Now, after this bifurcation of India-possessed Jammu and Kashmir into two and the promised re-possession of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir soon, will this move ensure India’s entry into the UN Security Council, or close this already half-open door for ever?

Article Title Image 3 By Lesly Derksen. Graphics: Adobe SP.

We know the UN Security Council was formed after the Second World War. U.S., U.K., Russia, France and China were the five permanent members then and they are still now. It must also be remembered that why they were the only five permanent members in the Security Council was because these five countries were never part of the Hitler’s or Mussolini’s or Hirohito’s move to divide the world between them and were the countries which helped stop the dividing of the world by Germany, Italy and Japan. It is to be remembered here that no attempts till now by Italy, Germany and Japan to enter the Security Council as permanent members were successful. It looks like an unwritten law that no fascist, autocratic, theocratic or non-secular country shall be admitted into the UN Security Council as permanent members which becomes significant in the matter of India’s attempts to enter the coveted council as a permanent member. India now qualifies in all these respects for permanently being kept out, it looks.

Article Title Image 4 By Mostafa Meraji. Graphics: Adobe SP.

The permanent membership in the Security Council has not always been without changes in representation. The China which was given a permanent membership was the Kuomintang China under Chiang Kai-shek which became extinct in 1949 following the Chinese Communist Revolution when the People’s Republic of China was established. Chiang Kai-shek who escaped to Formosa held on to the permanent membership for a time but then in …. it went to the Communist China. So, we cannot say that there were not changes in the permanent membership in the UN Security Council though there were not additions. When the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics split into several states also this question of who will represent Russia in the Security Council arose.

Article Title Image 5 By Prayer Flags. Graphics: Adobe SP.

More English articles by the author at:
http://sahyadribooks-remesh.blogspot.com/

Malayalam articles by the author at:
http://sahyadrimalayalam.blogspot.in/

More political article by the author here:
http://sahyadribooks-remesh.blogspot.com/p/list-of-political-articles.html

About the Author P. S. Remesh Chandran:

Editor of Sahyadri Books & Bloom Books, Trivandrum. Author of several books in English and in Malayalam. And also author of Swan: The Intelligent Picture Book. Born and brought up in the beautiful village of Nanniyode in the Sahya Mountain Valley in Trivandrum, in Kerala. Father British Council trained English teacher and Mother University educated. Matriculation with distinction and Pre Degree Studies in Science with National Merit Scholarship. Discontinued Diploma studies in Electronics and entered politics. Unmarried and single.

Face Book: https://www.facebook.com/psremeshchandra.trivandrum
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PSRemeshChandra
You Tube: http://www.youtube.com/user/bloombooks/videos
Blog: http://sahyadribooks-remesh.blogspot.com/
Site: https://sites.google.com/site/timeuponmywindowsill/
E-Mail: bloombookstvm@gmail.com

Post: P. S. Remesh Chandran, Editor, Sahyadri Books, Trivandrum, Padmalayam, Nanniyode, Pacha Post, Trivandrum- 695562, Kerala State, South India.

Tags:

UN Security Council Membership, Kashmir Abrogation Bifurcation Issue, August 2019, Hitler Mussolini Hirohito, News Communication Blackout, Curfew, India Pakistan, Voting Machine, BJP, India News,

First published on: Published on September 12, 2019

Other image for this article:

Article Title Image 6 By Musaib Iqbal. Graphics: Adobe SP.