240
What difference is there between the head-broken Kerala State Lokayukta and the Central Election Commission? If it was Pinarayi Vijayan who broke the first one, then it was his political partner Narendra Modi who broke the second one!
P. S. Remesh Chandran
Editor, Sahyadri Books & Bloom Books, Trivandrum
What difference is there between the head-broken Kerala State Loka Ayukta and the Central Election Commission? Aren't both reflecting the opinions and wishes of those who subjugated them and backing them by ignoring some of the existing laws without fully understanding any laws and only pointing out a few others of the existing laws?
If it was Pinarayi Vijayan who broke the first one in Kerala, was it not his political partner Narendra Modi who broke second one at the Centre? Weren’t both for being in power and not get caught in corruption? Were both works the honest men do? Aren't both of them with the same political moves and life goals? Both with the help of corporates carried out coups in their own parties, got into government, live for corporates, and while in government pour all the public money they control into corporates without any dignity and self-esteem of politicians, and it they call it development!
The party of the one at the centre collects money through bonds from the big money launderers of the country through banks, and the party of the one at the state collects black money through direct corruption and smuggling, and also launders corruption money and bribes through banks.
The President of the country after a heated and heavy political brawl between the State Governor and the Chief Minister of Kerala ratifying and endorsing the amendment of law passed by the Kerala Legislative Assembly led as the Assembly Leader by the Chief Minister and pseudo-Marxist leader Pinarayi Vijayan who already faces cases against him in the head-broken Anti-Corruption Judicial Body the Kerala Lok Ayukta to the effect that even if they find him and them guilty of corruption and issues a verdict none of the Chief Minister himself and his Cabinet Ministers need immediately resign as earlier they had to but whether he or they need resign shall be decided on his or their appeal by the State Legislative Assembly majority-orchestrated by him and themselves, was a severe blow and setback to the already picking up anti-corruption movements in the state as well as in the country. The Centre has not come up with the much publicized comprehensive anti-corruption Law the Lok Pal either.
Similarly, after invalidating five or six unimportant actions/decisions/legislations by the central government and deluding people that everything is fair in the running of this country, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court very lightly and unconscientiously upholding the very important and significant new central law amendment that as against the country’s long-standing policy and decision hitherto that the Central Election Commissioners shall be selected and appointed from a panel jointly by the Judiciary’s representative the Chief Justice, the Legislature’s representative the Opposition Leader in the Parliament, and the Executive’s representative the Prime Minister of the country, from hence now forth shall be decided jointly by a committee consisting of the Legislature’s representative the Opposition Leader and two Executive’s representatives the Prime Minister and the Home Minister, with no representative at all from the Judiciary, only taught the people that it was for upholding the latter smoothly and convincingly that the invalidation of the former were undertaken, and that the amendment in the selection process of the Central Election Commissioners was solely for the purpose of easing electoral irregularities and ensuring the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s continuance in rule. Why is the judiciary bending so much, apparently stooping before the Executive, in front of the people? The Supreme Court reasoned (ridiculously and dishonestly) that there was no time to look at the law or current practices as the elections were too near! Who has no time for law- the Judiciary or the Executive? How many times in the past has the Judiciary said law cannot be looked at because there’s no time?
Written on: 19 March 2024 and first published on: 22 March 2024
Original article in Malayalam written on 19 March 2024 and first published on: 21 March 2024
SM1559. മണു്ടയൊടിച്ച കേരളസംസ്ഥാനലോകായുക്തയും കേന്ദ്രയിലക്ഷ൯കമ്മീഷനുംതമ്മിലു് എന്തുവ്യത്യാസമാണുള്ളതു്? ഒന്നി൯റ്റെമണു്ടയൊടിച്ചതു് പിണറായിവിജയനാണെങ്കിലു് മറ്റതി൯റ്റെമണു്ടയൊടിച്ചതു് അയാളുടെരാഷ്ട്രീയപങ്കാളിയായ നരേന്ദ്രമോദിയാണെന്നല്ലേയുള്ളൂ?
https://sahyadrimalayalam.blogspot.com/2024/03/1559.html
No comments:
Post a Comment